News
South China Morning Post reports a Shanghai man, Liu Hui, paid 170,000 yuan after a woman used AI to pose as a doctor and the doctor's mother since 2021.
Reported by
South China Morning PostAccording to the South China Morning Post, a 65-year-old woman built a fake identity so convincing that it took five years and 7,000 video posts to pay off. She used artificial intelligence to play two people at once: a young doctor and that doctor's mother.
The scam worked because it never asked to be believed all at once. It asked to be believed a little, over and over, for years.
The woman, using the name Yu Xiuzhen, connected with a Shanghai resident named Liu Hui on a social media platform in 2021. She told him she was 29 years old and a doctor at a prestigious Grade 3A hospital in Shanghai. She said she had influence over property engineering projects at the hospital.
That claim mattered. It gave her a reason to need money, and a reason Liu might trust that the money would come back to him somehow, through her position.
A single message can be checked. A profile with almost 7,000 video posts and 10,000 followers cannot be checked the same way. Yu shared details of her daily life on that profile for years, building a version of a person that looked lived-in rather than invented.
This is what the sequence shows: the scam did not depend on one convincing lie. It depended on volume. Thousands of small, ordinary posts did the work that no single fabricated document could do, because a viewer scrolling through years of daily-life content has already done the verifying in their own head before any money is asked for.
The second identity, the mother, is where the artificial intelligence came in. Playing two people, a young doctor and her own mother, let the same person corroborate herself. A doubt raised with the daughter could be settled by a conversation with the mother. There was no independent party in the exchange at all.
Liu paid 170,000 yuan, about US$25,000, before the story fell apart. The South China Morning Post's report does not say what finally exposed it or whether Liu has recovered any of the money.
The lesson sits in the structure, not the amount. Any relationship built entirely inside one platform, sustained by one person's own content, and confirmed by a second person who is never met in real life, has no outside check built into it. Two voices that always agree with each other are not two voices.